Saturday, July 30, 2011

Save Our Schools March in Sacramento

            An estimated 2000 – 3,000  parents, teachers, and public education supporters marched in Washington, D.C. and in  eleven  support rallies in other cities including Sacramento, California  on July 30.  The Sacramento event had about 100 participants. The events were organized by parent groups and other pro public education groups and supported by teachers unions.  The rally, although small by Washington standards was at least 20 times larger than the Tea Party rally held in Washington this week in support of the Tea Party’s proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution to balance the budget.
            There was limited media coverage of the Save Our Schools rallies.  The Save Our Schools March was organized by a wide variety of local groups and education advocates.  Speakers included Diane Ravitch, Jonathan Kozol, José Vilson, Deborah Meier, Monty Neill, Cornel West, and Pedro Noguera, among others.  Schools around the country are suffering from severe  budget cuts and teacher lay offs  imposed by the economic crisis and the  resultant decisions of legislatures to cut budgets.
In addition parents and  teachers  say they are fed up with so-called “reform” policies in No Child Left Behind  that falsely label more than 80% of U.S. public schools as failures.   They oppose several programs of the Obama Administration included Race to the Top including the proposed new amendments to the NCLB law that would increase competition between under funded schools.   March participants, including many teacher union members, oppose the shift to more for-profit charter schools rather than public schools,  the assault on the teachers’ unions,  and the emphasis on high stakes testing which has driven many public goals from the school curriculum.
Parents and teachers insist on more democratic participation in reform effort rather than the current domination of “reform” agenda by corporate and Right Wing interests including the Gates, Broad, and Bradley  Foundation, among others.

More information on the ongoing effort to organize parents into a support system can be found at
             The  media typically selects other school reform “performers” as experts although few of these have ever taught in a public school for more than a few months.  The corporate sponsored performers    pit  their slogans , such as “All Children Can Learn, “  “No Excuses.” or “No Child Left Behind,”   - wrapped up in the populist appeal to common sense - against the views of parents and teachers who actually work with children. At the same time the corporate sponsored performers oppose  discussion of the results of the economic collapse of 2008/2010  on school budgets and oppose discussion any notion of social and economic justice.  They hide their reactionary politics and   their corporate funding,   beneath their  appeal to over simplified slogans   that fail to deal with budget realities and school realities during this economic crisis .
The anti-democratic tendencies of fast food thought and sound bite discourse are clear  in the  media recognized voices of “school reform” from Joel Klien,  Michele Rhee to Arne Duncan and dozens more.  
For these media  recognized “reformers”, over simplification of complex school issues  is  wrapped up in self serving  slogans.  These  foundation and corporate sponsored  over simplifications, undercuts the ability of the  public and teachers  to participate in making  informed  decisions.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Don't fall for this, it sounds like a reasonable proposal for moderate difference from the NCLB reforms, but remember, this is from the union. The union is who made it so that during layoffs, the teacher with the least experience is automatically fired, even if there is an older, poorly performing teacher, so kids are hurt to protect older teachers over younger ones. Also, reforms were rejected for many years by these people because the teachers had tenure and no merit pay, so if a principal told them to do something, they just refused and didn't get any consequences as a result. Before NCLB, children were graduating high school illiterate. Don't fall for it, these people support the status quo.